




This past weekend, I took a much needed vacation from my family. I have been living at home for the past 5 and 1/2 months and while I love my family, I needed a break. So off I went for a short visit with friends. On the last day of my trip, I decided that it would be nice to make dinner for me and Kara, my dear friend with whom I was staying. I decided to cook chicken, wild rice and sauteed veggies - old standbys that are fast, easy and delicious. So off to the store I went.
I was making dinner while Kara was upstairs packing for a trip. I got out the pans and went looking for the things I would need to cook the veggies and chicken- salt, pepper and olive oil. I found the olive oil sitting on the counter and the salt and pepper near the stove. I cooked the chicken – browning it to perfection, making sure that it was fully cooked on the inside but remained juicy. I cut the veggies up, red peppers cut in circular patterns that looked like 4-leaf clovers, julienned zucchini and yellow squash sliced into half circles. I firmly believe that presentation is at least half of what makes food taste good, so I made sure the veggies were a combination of colors and patterns. I then sautéed the veggies in the olive oil and the rice finally finished cooking. I dished it all up on plates and it looked beautiful – honestly it could have been a picture in a magazine. I was pretty proud of myself.
We blessed the food and then dug in. I took a bite and it didn’t taste very good at all. I wondered if the chicken was bad, even though it was fresh at the store. Maybe the oil had gone rancid or something. I turned to Kara and said, “This chicken tastes weird. It is not very good.” I didn’t want her to fake politeness if she thought it was disgusting. By saying it myself, I hoped she would be honest if she thought it taste gross. Kara is so well bred that she would totally eat everything on her plate, even if it the worst dinner ever and be totally gracious, thanking you the entire time. She is just that type of person.
I then tried the veggies. They too weren’t that great either. Something just wasn't right. Kara took a bite and while trying to be polite agreed that it was not the best cooking. I took another bite, trying to identify what went wrong. I am typically a pretty decent cook and I didn’t think I was THAT out of practice. Plus it is really hard to screw up chicken and rice and sautéed veggies.
I took one more bite and proclaimed, “it kind of tastes like dish soap.” Kara raised her eyebrows and then asked what I had used to cook the veggies and chicken. I said “ the olive oil that was on the counter.” She looked panicked and said, “That was the dish soap.”
Apparently in Kara’s family they decided that it looks nicer to keep your dish soap in an olive oil decanter instead of the Dawn bottle. I agree that it looks prettier, but can I recommend that should you chose to do this, use a type of dish soap that is a color other than the one that looks JUST like olive oil – use green, blue, purple, even clear, but steer clear of the gold.
The good news is that dish soap flavored dinner makes water taste like candy! Water never tasted so good! I drank a lot of it too – close to a gallon of it (as that is the recommended treatment for accidental ingestion.) Needless to say, we threw away our dinner and scrounged up some leftovers out of Kara’s fridge. It is a good thing we both have a sense of humor.
Trust Your First Impression
Gladwell's argument throughout the book is that decisions made quickly can be just as good as decisions make cautiously and deliberately. There is no need to spend hours and hours with a guy (or girl) if your first impression is that they are not compatible with you. I know some of you may argue that at first you couldn't stand your current boyfriend or your spouse but it turns out they are your soul mate. I am not going to argue with you. This is just what he says.

Seriously though, think back to the times you first met all of your exes or guys that wanted to day you but you didn't want to date them – what was your initial reaction? I personally think there is a lot of merit to Gladwell's argument, but that may be because I make snap judgments all of the time. Gladwell says that all you need is two second. I typically give guys more than two seconds, but they typically don't get more than 2 hours unless I am interested. (Dinner is WAY more than sufficient to know if there is a connection or not, especially if there is not.)
You Will Change Your Mind
This just might be my favorite take away from this book. Basically it boils down to the fact that we are all fickle. We all have our idea of the type of person we are looking for: intelligent and charming, sweet and sensitive, rugged and outdoorsy, outgoing and confident, etc. However, Gladwell writes of a couple (Sheena Iyengar - psychologist & Raymond Fisman - economist) who run a speed-dating event in NYC. Their event is much like other speed-dating events. The only difference is before the event, after the evening ends, a month after the event, and then six-months after participants have to fill out a questionnaire about what they are looking for in a potential partner. Iyengar & Fisman have discovered that participants are not very good at identifying those characteristics to which they are attracted. Gladwell used the example of "Mary" who before the event began said she was looking for someone who was "intelligent & sincere". "John" a participant with whom "Mary" had instant attraction was more "attractive and funny" than he was "intelligent & sincere". As a result, in the follow up survey at the end of the evening what "Mary" is looking for has changed to "attractive & funny". At the month mark, "Mary" has gone back to wanting "intelligent & sincere." So what type of guy does "Mary" really want? My guess is that she doesn't really know because her subconscious wants one thing while her conscious mind wants something else.
I think this happens to all of us. We can be attracted to one type of guy (or girl) one day and an entirely different type the next.
Case in Point:
Beware of Beautiful
Anyone who knows me knows that I am shallow, at least when I first meet people. If a guy isn't at least an 8.5 I will not really notice him. I am not saying that I will ignore him completely, but I won't notice if he is attractive or not. His personality (and how he is dressed – yes I am THAT shallow!) is what will make me like or dislike him at this point. This little "quirk" of mine has gotten me into a bit of a mess on an occasion or two.
Several years ago I went to a party at friend's ho
use. At this party I met my friend's boyfriend's roommate. I will call him Jeff. Jeff was (and still is) a looker. (Yes, he does resemble Ryan Reynolds, swoon!) He is a solid 9 and therefore I was attracted to him right away. Jeff and I clicked, but there were some red flags. One particular red flag was the fact that he was not religious and I am. I fell for Jeff pretty hard, even though I knew that he wasn't what I ultimately wanted.
Gladwell calls this the "Warren Harding Error." Apparently Warren Harding (one of the worst US Presidents in history) was a bit of a looker. The American public thought he looked "presidential" so he was elected, even though he sucked as a president and was not really qualified. This bias (what my sister and friends have called the "hotness" bias) can interfere with our ability to make "good" two second decisions.
Play Detective – aka "The Secrets of the Bedroom"
Gladwell argues that if you really want to know what someone is like instead of going out with them twice a week for a year, you should drop by their house when they are not home and have a look around: open their closets, look in their fridge, use their bathroom, and look at their photos. By looking around someone's house you can learn as much about them as you would dating them for months on end.
I found this tidbit kind of hilarious because I once came to the conclusion that things would never work out with a guy after I had used his bathroom. It was about our third date and we had gone to his house to watch a movie after dinner. I asked to use his bathroom. The bathroom was not disgustingly dirty – it was, in fact, pretty clean. But it was the bottles of Kiehl's products lining the countertop that doomed him to the "friend zone". I don't know about you, but for me dating a guy who spends more money on skincare products than I do is NOT okay. I am supposed to be more high maintenance than any guy I date.
See Them in Their Native Habitat
Okay so this one might be a stretch – I extrapolated it from the idea that market research should be conducted when/where a product is to be consumed. Gladwell makes the argument that when we try something like Pepsi or Coke at a central location test (single sip at a grocery store or something like that) our experience is different than if we take a case home and drink it for a week. He argues that we also have a hard time separating the product from the package because they are linked. We don't just by the contents of something; we are also buying the package. (This could explain why when faced with two similar items, I always go with the "pretty" packaging. It could also explain my "hotness bias").
So using Gladwell's theory, we need to see the people that we date in their "natural habitat." We need to see them and how they interact with their friends, their family, and their coworkers.
We should also spend time with them vegging at home, at sporting events, etc. Basically see them as they are in "real life" not just on fun and exciting dates. (This is exactly why shows like The Bachelor & The Bachelorette fail WAY more often than they are successful –although it doesn't stop me from watching that train wreck!)
Stop Being a Girl: Analysis Paralysis
Gladwell argues that sometimes we spend hours, days, months or even years collecting data, running more tests (as in the case of hospitals testing for heart attack which is an example used in the book), etc all in the name of making better decisions. However often times all this data and tests are no more effective at helping us make a decision. We now have so much information that we often lose site of the bigger picture.
When it comes to dating I am THE worst when it comes to over analyzing things, particularly when it comes to what I did o
r didn't do. Should I have sat closer to him, was I too close, or was I okay? Should I invite him to my work Christmas party or will that seem too serious? Did I totally blow any chances of things working out when I mentioned going to lunch with my coworker and friend – who just happens to be male? What does it mean when he calls me after six months of no communication? What about when it has been over a year? Does that mean that he wants to get back together or that he wants to be friends? I could go on and on with the questions as I am sure most girls (and guys to some extent as well) can. All that I really need to know is "Do I like this guy?" and "Do I want to pursue things further?"
Gladwell writes that we have the ability to "read minds" through intuition, facial expression and body mannerisms. However when our emotions run high, we are stressed or our bodies are tired, our ability to read minds is diminished. Our judgment is thereby impaired and we do things that we otherwise wouldn't do (like make out with a guy you hardly know). So remember to be home by midnight to avoid "impaired judgment."
Other random tidbits from "Blink"

I had a great time. I did some (read VERY little) homework while laying on the beach, trying to even out my tan lines. It was a great time to spend with new and old friends and to just enjoy hours and hours of sunshine. We did take some time out from the beach to watch the BYU vs. Oklahoma game - GO COUGS!! We also hit downtown San Diego for dinner. I had a great time and REALLY want to move to Southern California after graduating. What is there not to love?
After dinner we headed to Zion's Bank for an industry professional presentations. We listened to Nathan Anderson from Union Pacific talk about Business to Business Marketing. It was fairly interesting - much more so than last year, but I think that may have something to do with the fact that I actually understood all of the business lingo that what used. What a difference a year makes!
Yes we are kind of ridiculous with all of our photos, but we had a good time. My favorite photo in this collage is the one of the girls jumping in the air (I took the photo and it makes me happy every time I look at it.) And to quote my friend Rand, "Moab was a big success. Although I was unable to attend, I know it was a success because there were dozens of photos of women in the program jumping in the air at the same time, which is a key success metric of any road trip."
After an hour or so of socializing, it was time to get dressed for the Capstone event - the Rafting excursion down the Colorado River, also known as "Rafts vs. Duckies" Basically the float down the river turns into a humongous water fight. It is a LOT of fun, especially since it was about 100 degrees.
(Please note Nicole and I smiling nicely in our ducky. We were minding our business watching everyone else get thrown into the river while we stayed nice and dry. Directly below the picture of Nicole & I is an overturned ducky. Sadly it was Nicole and I. After evading everyone's attempts to overturn us for at least a couple of hours, we got dumped. In the photo to the left is our pathetic attempt to hold onto our ducky while trying to overturn Kyle's. As you may have guessed, we were unsuccessful.)
After lunch in the parking lot, we loaded the vans for the journey back to Provo; tired, a little sunburned and ready for another fun year with MBAMA.